Jump to content
IGNORED

Doctor Who


FishyFish

Recommended Posts

That was ok, but there were a few nasty incidents of scenery chewing from certain people and also the writer trying to push characters to conclusions that he hadn't worked for yet. For example, when the thick woman attacked Rory for no reason and then bellowed "WE JUST WANT TO LIIIIVE, RORY!" Maybe if everyone had been callously going on about catching the clones and destroying them, that would have made sense, but Rory was about the furthest from that sentiment out of the whole cast.

Failing to join the dots seems like a recurring problem in this series actually, as it was the same when they wanted everyone to be on the run with tally marks on their skin in the second episode, but never explained why or how that had happened (though they used the loss of memory device better later in that same episode, so it would have worked better if the order of the scenes was swapped around).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

That was ok, but there were a few nasty incidents of scenery chewing from certain people and also the writer trying to push characters to conclusions that he hadn't worked for yet. For example, when the thick woman attacked Rory for no reason and then bellowed "WE JUST WANT TO LIIIIVE, RORY!" Maybe if everyone had been callously going on about catching the clones and destroying them, that would have made sense, but Rory was about the furthest from that sentiment out of the whole cast.

I found that section to be quite a convincing part of the idea of them being extremely confused and disoriented, and in a state of panic and shock about their real identity (and what identity even means in the context where there is more than one of you). Making it any more obvious would have made it seem clunky - characters, like people, shouldn't/don't go around stating their emotions blithely. Instead, feelings are implied by their actions and words. I felt this lashing out, in a state of terror and confusion (she, after all, was the one ganger amongst the originals) felt like a typically humane reaction, when you lash out at those closest to you, who often deserve it least, when you feel under threat. If all that had to be explained then I would have found that irritating.

This was an episode where I felt like the characters were allowed to develop at a more gentle pace (rather than a ton of "action" or plot development), which made it an extremely refreshing piece of slow boiling character sci-fi.

I think the lesson here is that it's very difficult to please everyone.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's not quite like we went from Caves of Androzani into The Twin Dilemma but frankly anything was going to suffer in comparison to last week's. It was at least better than something like Tooth and Claw.

The Rory coping with his Auton issues was by far the most interesting bit though.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I've just started watching Who after a looong break and I quiet enjoyed that episode. It maybe helped that I was watching it purely as a bit of family entertainment as I have absolutely no knowledge of the modern Doctors really. Anyway, the premis as to exactly why they would need Gangers in the first place was ridiculous and there was a bit of a hamfest at times but I liked some of the ideas the story bought up (Especially when the Doctor said he could rescue them all and the susequant conversation between the worker and the ganger as to who would go home) and it was quite creepy at times. Not bad really at all. Although I hated the turn into a snake bit, I really hope that they realised how bad this was and it's going to get forgotten as the gangers forms become more 'set'

Also I really like Matt Smith, which suprised me as for some reason I didn't think I would. I think he could be one of the great Doctors.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

That was ok, but there were a few nasty incidents of scenery chewing from certain people and also the writer trying to push characters to conclusions that he hadn't worked for yet. For example, when the thick woman attacked Rory for no reason and then bellowed "WE JUST WANT TO LIIIIVE, RORY!" Maybe if everyone had been callously going on about catching the clones and destroying them, that would have made sense, but Rory was about the furthest from that sentiment out of the whole cast.

Arguably she had stronger motives for her hysterical reaction than you are crediting her with. Rory was evidently sympathetic towards her, but, prior to their confrontation in the lavatory, there didn't appear to be a shadow of a doubt in his mind that she was anything other than human. Up to that point, Rory hadn't expressed any opinion about gangers, so it would be entirely plausible for her to fear that he might have an aversion to them. True, he did arrive accompanying the Doctor, who was voluble in his criticisms of the crew's attitude towards the flesh/gangers, but that wouldn't tell her anything certain of Rory's sentiments.

Furthermore, because of the Doctor's false ID, she would likely have been under the misapprehension that Rory was either a civil servant or representative of the government; both positions would at the very least incentivize Rory to dispose of autonomous gangers. Bearing all that in mind, together with the confusion and self-doubt Jennifer-ganger was subject to following the storm, I think there was justification enough for her sudden display of aggression.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Ooooh. Very Interesting Theory about Flesh/Amy (and spoilers for episode 7)

Amy is a Flesh. That explains the Schrodinger's Baby - the transmission to the Ganger is changing and it can't adapt.

Also - look at the trailer

At 45 seconds. The Doctor, talking to an Amy in front of him, says ""Whatever happens, however hard, however far- we will find you." Is he talking to a kidnapped Amy - who's been transmitting to/living via a Ganger this entire time (since 6x01?) and doesn't even know she's been kidnapped?

That's what Eye patch lady is - a "real" person, checking on "real" Amy that's leaking into her consciousness/being transmitted to the Ganger.

The Doctor seemed to go the planet for a reason, and new more about the Flesh than his lets on. Was he there investigating Amy?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't know... this episode just doesn't smack of having anything to do with the larger storyline! It feels pretty standalone, self contained. A lot of things could be explained by 'hes a ganger!' theory, it'd almost be too easy.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Two minutes of bad guys and hats. Vaguely related to the thread...

I'd be more interested in how the flesh might interact with the Silents rather than with the Amy (actually that just sounds wrong on a number of levels...) For a start didn't they say that the Silents were

on every planet? They haven't been making much noise since ep 2 in that case...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thought that episode was surprisingly good. I agree that the descent into 'we're at war!' territory felt a bit forced, but apart from that it was well directed, nicely creepy and there were some excellent lines of dialogue.

None of which was true for Fear Her.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't know... this episode just doesn't smack of having anything to do with the larger storyline! It feels pretty standalone, self contained. A lot of things could be explained by 'hes a ganger!' theory, it'd almost be too easy.

If this wasn't telegraphed that the Doc is fucking about in time then I don't know what is. "I'm a great parker".

http://www.bbc.co.uk/iplayer/episode/b011fnd4/Doctor_Who_Series_6_The_Rebel_Flesh/

25.18mins-25.52mins.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'd forgotten all about that moment until now. I thought it seemed a bit disjointed when I watched it - like the scene in Flesh & Stone where the Doctor talks to Amy when her eyes were closed also felt out of place, even if you didn't notice the jacket continuity.

---

A Russell T Davies interview... doesn't really talk about Doctor Who much, it's more about his advice to people starting out in TV writing:

But as for getting your foot on the ladder... well, I’m wary of using anything just to get in. You should love those shows anyway. A lot of people use soaps – and something like the BBC’s Doctors has a rare and unsung programme of finding new writers – but you should go to that show loving medical drama in the first place. They’ll smell a cynic a mile off. It’s the same with children’s – that’s often suggested as a way in, and it does have a lot of opportunities, but often there’s an assumption that children’s TV is ‘easier’. Which isn’t true at all, it’s very specialised and highly demanding. But, nonetheless, both are high-volume areas that need a high turnover of writers.

Ah, but that’s boring advice, isn’t it? That’s like saying ‘learn to walk before you can run’, which is bollocks. Start running straight away. Run past everyone else. If you hate soaps and children’s and want to write a 20 part epic about the life of Nelson Mandela, then write it, and if it’s good, it’ll get made. I seriously believe that. Good stuff gets made in the end. So write with passion and honesty and ignore boring advice.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Did anything ever come of that bit with him suddenly going back and talking to amy, or was it just a production fuck up? I can't remember.

It was a Doctor from a a different timeline jumping around and trying to fix stuff in the final episode of last season. It was brilliant, how could you forget!?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

For those saying "why did the gangers suddenly turn violent?", er, so did the humans. With exactly the same sentiment.

In fact, the humans started it.

No they didn't, Jen(?) turned violent first after throwing up and realising what she was then somewhat strangely long-arming Rory, and the sentiment of violence after that wasn't the same either, they were up for it then calmed down and were brought in after which that confrontational woman killed one of them (which I guess you mean by the humans starting it?). The gangers sentiment was just that they want to live, isn't it? How's that the same as the originals reason for violence? They're unsettled by others potentially possessing their lives, and then get egged on by mad killer woman going way over the top about that and subsequent reaction of the gangers being pretty much "right, we'll do you for that!".

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue. Use of this website is subject to our Privacy Policy, Terms of Use, and Guidelines.