Jump to content
IGNORED

PlayStation 5 - Next gen is expensive


Eighthours

Recommended Posts

43 minutes ago, Uncle Mike said:

I don't know Time to Beat as a source? Is that someone with predetermined knowledge ploughing through only the essential quests in order to see the final story cutscene? I'd be surprised if many people beat UC4 in 15 hours on their first go, for example.

The list says “ time to complete main story “ so I assume ignores any side quests etc . 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Stanley said:

If that £349 price for the digital version is correct I think I’m going to get that one, that’s an amazing price. 

Where did you hear that? Good price if true.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

19E264ED-C6A8-4B0B-AF51-3A3B8DDBEFB2.thumb.jpeg.d7a971c77e20b9a0e75090bd046a56b6.jpeg

 

the problem taking the Main Story figure is that this is GTA. Who the hell just main lines a GTA game. Your lucky to find someone who actually does the main story.

 

 

As for the discussion on a price. For the last 20 years or so I’ve said £1 per hour = value for money. However it’s a bit more complicated than that. A good game time for me is probably around the 18 hour mark. That’s meaty. Let’s face it, anything around the 50-75 hour mark is full of sub par shite. Might be a great game but there’s no doubt a lot to filler in there.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

42 minutes ago, Harrisown said:

19E264ED-C6A8-4B0B-AF51-3A3B8DDBEFB2.thumb.jpeg.d7a971c77e20b9a0e75090bd046a56b6.jpeg

 

the problem taking the Main Story figure is that this is GTA. Who the hell just main lines a GTA game. Your lucky to find someone who actually does the main story.

 

 

As for the discussion on a price. For the last 20 years or so I’ve said £1 per hour = value for money. However it’s a bit more complicated than that. A good game time for me is probably around the 18 hour mark. That’s meaty. Let’s face it, anything around the 50-75 hour mark is full of sub par shite. Might be a great game but there’s no doubt a lot to filler in there.

 

Everyone I know who bought the game(GTA V) played it till the very end. Why wouldn't you?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

While we were having this discussion today my son has spent $20 on a Captain America skin for Fortnite. I can see why traditional game developers could be tearing their hair out when we’re arguing over the value of full games while Epic are raking it in. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Super Craig said:

There's no way that any version of the PS5 is going to have an RRP/MSRP of under £400 at launch. That's nuts.

I really think it will or it’s dead in the water - no console on the market has done well over £400. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Stanley said:

I really think it will or it’s dead in the water - no console on the market has done well over £400. 

It's not going to happen. Both consoles will be £450+

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, mdn2 said:

It's not going to happen. Both consoles will be £450+

Most rumours are below that and stating a £100 difference between the two versions, that would make the disc version £550 - I can’t see that happening. These are mass market devices and they will not gain traction at those prices. They’ll take a hit on the hardware if they have to, especially the digital version. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

59 minutes ago, Ghosty said:

 

Everyone I know who bought the game(GTA V) played it till the very end. Why wouldn't you?

 

 I didn't. it got very repetitive and I hate the controls. Mushy and imprecise. Not to mention the world just feels like a set.. no real interactivity its all just for show.

 

I know I'm alone but I find the series really, really shallow. I love RDR2 though, so go figure.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

34 minutes ago, Dirty Harry Potter said:

 

 I didn't. it got very repetitive and I hate the controls. Mushy and imprecise. Not to mention the world just feels like a set.. no real interactivity its all just for show.

 

I know I'm alone but I find the series really, really shallow. I love RDR2 though, so go figure.

 

I always thought the shallowness was part of the schtick to be honest! I loved it, but it's a cold, dead thing compared to the wonder of RDR2 for me :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Dirty Harry Potter said:

 

 I didn't. it got very repetitive and I hate the controls. Mushy and imprecise. Not to mention the world just feels like a set.. no real interactivity its all just for show.

 

I know I'm alone but I find the series really, really shallow. I love RDR2 though, so go figure.

 

That makes sense. Never played RDR2, but I enjoyed the first one. Slow paced and a lot more relaxing to play.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, Majora said:

I've completed about ten of those games and they all took me waaaay longer to beat than those times listed there. Are those times just to mainline the story and do absolutely nothing else?

 

I hope Last of Us Remastered is longer than that because if that's true I'm 2/3rds through and the much praised plot could so far be described as "Man tries to save 3 women, fails twice".

 

5 hours ago, Stanley said:

If that £349 price for the digital version is correct I think I’m going to get that one, that’s an amazing price. 

 

That same guess in the thread also thought it'd be cheaper here than in the US, which I'm taking as an indication of its likely accuracy.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Stanley said:

Most rumours are below that and stating a £100 difference between the two versions, that would make the disc version £550 - I can’t see that happening. These are mass market devices and they will not gain traction at those prices. They’ll take a hit on the hardware if they have to, especially the digital version. 

 

The PS4 and PS4 Pro launched at £349. The PS5 has an SSD that's going to cost more than the HDD they currently use. Then there's the fact that our currency is fucked.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Super Craig said:

 

The PS4 and PS4 Pro launched at £349. The PS5 has an SSD that's going to cost more than the HDD they currently use. Then there's the fact that our currency is fucked.

 

Yep, I'm expecting £449 for the full fat version, and £100 drop to the download only.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, Hitcher said:

Which is why releasing it at a higher price would mean a lot less sales.


I don’t think you really understand the meaning of currency is fucked. Why sell a console that’s in short supply at $350 in the U.K. when you can sell it for $500 in the US?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

25 minutes ago, Vespa Alex said:

 

Yep, I'm expecting £449 for the full fat version, and £100 drop to the download only.

 

£350 would be knee tremblingly good. I think that would push enough people to get it and then pay the £65 pound a game that a few people have already said they're happy to pay.

 

I still think the all digital version will be 400 though.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

22 minutes ago, footle said:


I don’t think you really understand the meaning of currency is fucked. Why sell a console that’s in short supply at $350 in the U.K. when you can sell it for $500 in the US?

The economy is fucked worldwide, but that’s besides the point. The idea of two models is so that you can sell one, the digital version you really want to sell, for a much more affordable price than the higher end model. 
 

Or from another perspective, Project Lockhart/series is rumoured to be priced a lot less still - like sub £300 - if you want to be competitive you can’t have your ‘cheaper’ console priced at £150-£200 more. 
 

PS5 Digital will be £349-£399 and PS5 full fat £449-£499, and I’m leaning towards £379 max top end for digital. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The Xbox One X and PS4 Pro cost about £350 with a bundled game at Argos today. Expecting any of the next gen consoles to launch near that price is madness.

 

Series S, probably. Microsoft didn’t temporarily knock £100 off the One X bundles for nothing.

 

Edit - the Switch is still £280! Microsoft and Sony can probably justify more than a £70 price gap in the customer’s mind.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue. Use of this website is subject to our Privacy Policy, Terms of Use, and Guidelines.