Jump to content
IGNORED

After Life - Ricky Gervais


gospvg
 Share

Recommended Posts

 

Added to Netflix, a six-part series.

 

After Life follows Tony, who has a perfect life before his wife suddenly dies. After contemplating suicide, he then decides to live long enough to punish the world for his wife's death by literally saying and doing whatever he wants to. Although he thinks of it as sort of a superpower, the situation turns tricky when everyone around him starts trying to make him a better person again.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If that's the trailer I saw the other day, how come ginger haired people/kids are fair game to take the piss out of but different races/religion/sexuality/etc isn't?

 

What's the difference? You can't control what colour hair you're born with.

 

Plus this will be over-sentimental shite like everything else he's done in the last 15 years.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

34 minutes ago, dave7g said:

It wasn't like that at all. he was taking shots at Bruce Jenner for being a cunt, he doesn't represent every trans person.

 

Right, so if a gay person is a cunt, I can make jokes about shirt lifting and AIDS because they're a cunt?

 

He deadnamed her repeatedly, then referred to the fact he deadnamed her, then made a terrible transphobic joke about gender identity.

 

I don't get how that's acceptable, regardless of Caitlyn Jenner's character.

 

It's cool though, you just deadnamed her too in your reply, top effort.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 minutes ago, Isaac said:

 

Right, so if a gay person is a cunt, I can make jokes about shirt lifting and AIDS because they're a cunt?

 

He deadnamed her repeatedly, then referred to the fact he deadnamed her, then made a terrible transphobic joke about gender identity.

 

I don't get how that's acceptable, regardless of Caitlyn Jenner's character.

 

It's cool though, you just deadnamed her too in your reply, top effort.

 

Ok so deadnaming was invented what 2 years ago. Bruce is what she was known as for SIXTY SIX years and was most famous as. Also I called her Bruce in context with Ricky's joke. 

 

You'd swear I got away with manslaughter.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Watched 3 episodes, enjoying it but it's a weird one. It seems stuck in the past, mostly feels like Derek with hints of Andy from Extras. It has some pretty awkward unintentional cringe moments, mainly relating to the wife sections that repeatably try to make 'sad' moments funny in similar forced ways (i.e swearing or cussing each other).

 

That said each episode does have some great moments, I especially like the postman bits. This show seems at it's best when it's trying to be Curb but Gervais keeps wanting to dial up the emotion, which normally I would applaud for a comedy but it's very difficult to get that right. On his own, Gervais really struggles to pull off 'emotion' in his various solo series.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, Capwn said:

Watched 3 episodes, enjoying it but it's a weird one. It mostly seems stuck in the past, mostly feels like Derek with hints of Andy from Extras. It has some pretty awkward unintentional cringe moments, mainly relating to the wife moments that repeatably try to make 'sad' moments funny in similar forced ways (i.e swearing or cussing each other).

 

That said each episode does have some great moments, I especially like the postman bits. This show seems at it's best when it's trying to be Curb but Gervais keeps wanting to dial up the emotion, which normally I would applaud for a comedy but it's very difficult to get that right. On his own, Gervais really struggles to pull off 'emotion' in his various solo series.

That's because Gervais is a poor actor. He lacks any sort of subtlety or nuance in his performance. He relies on cheap easy tricks and caricature to make his performance. The result will always be samey as he is using the same gimmicks and "tells".

 

He is a good scriptwriter when reined in (usually by merchant) he just needs to stop acting in the stuff he writes - also see Seth Macfarlane.

 

EDIT - with regard to the transphobic jokes - he also falls into the trap of believing the adage that you can make jokes about anything without understanding the actual meaning of the phrase. As it happens I believe it is true but it takes a talented standup comic to craft and tell those jokes that are on the edges of tastelessness - Gervais is not one.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

May I suggest that the transphobia conversation is taken to another thread? Very worthy of discussion but this isn’t the place for it, regardless of what your views are on Ricky Gervais.

 

As for After Life, I enjoyed it overall, but it wasn’t amazing. I think my favourite part was the fish finger scene in the cafe.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

30 minutes ago, Chadruharazzeb said:

 

He was making jokes about Caitlin Jenner not trans people. He was making a joke about the fact he accidentally deadnamed her before he'd heard about deadnaming. He was making a joke about being a chimp because he'd made a joke about inventing species identity. He was making jokes about having to constantly defend and justify himself to internet residents like you who get insulted on behalf of others.

 

Like he says, just because you're offended doesn't mean you're right.

As I said that only works if the jokes are funny and well crafted in my opinion they were neither. He is a clumsy standup using clumsy phrasing to make edgy humour which often just offends without being funny. Standup can be funny and offensive and skate the edge, he falls over it far too often.

 

As for the argument put elsewhere that 10000 people who paid to see him thought he was funny. Well that is a fairly specious argument. I am sure lots of people pay to see Jim Davidson and laugh at his jokes. Doesn't mean he is a good standup or not politically incorrect/offensive.

 

Popularity does not guarantee quality or indeed whether the humour is edgy and amusing or just falls over the line too often.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I just watched the whole of this in one afternoon. Ricky Gervais has been getting on my tits in everything he's done since the middle of The Office, but I really enjoyed this.

Who knew that could happen, eh?

I know it's a totally different thing, but it had a bit of that gentle Detectorists feel to it for me.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Gervais isn't transphobic and nor are people laughing at these jokes. Just because it's about trans people doesn't instantly make it transphobic. If we stop laughing at jokes about particular groups of people then comedy is dead. For me Gervais is just saying it's fine to do whatever you like (I don't care, I'm not against people transitioning), but don't expect society to go to extreme measures just so you don't suffer even the slightest bit of discomfort (deadnaming is a ridiculous concept).  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don’t know if I can say I enjoyed it because it’s basically not that far off my life and I don’t particularly enjoy that most of the time! It’s quite effective as a portrait of grief and depression and how hard it is to get out of that because you don’t really care anymore, though.

 

Taken as a comedy, it didn’t get a single laugh out of me. I doubt that was the result Gervais was aiming for with those jokes but going back to the point above about why is it okay to take the piss out of people with ginger hair, a lot of what Tony did wasn’t okay so it makes sense in that context. Where a smart retort is needed, all his sense of futility and bitterness has left him with is to call a kid a ‘tubby ginger cunt’.

 

That said, Tony’s humour wasn’t that great beforehand and if I were his wife, I’d have got a bit fed up with those practical jokes...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

47 minutes ago, Hylian said:

...but don't expect society to go to extreme measures just so you don't suffer even the slightest bit of discomfort (deadnaming is a ridiculous concept).  

 

Why is deadnaming a ‘ridiculous concept’? Surely referring to someone who has transitioned by their preferred name is just common courtesy and I’d hardly describe it as an ‘extreme measure’. Going out of your way to keep referring to someone by their old name seems unnecessarily prickish to me.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue. Use of this website is subject to our Privacy Policy, Terms of Use, and Guidelines.