Jump to content
Sign in to follow this  
papalazarou

The hustle

Recommended Posts

First trailer is out for the hustle which is remake of dirty rotten scoundrels - I love the original michael cain and Steve Martin are brilliant in it.  

 

This on the other hand looks terrible :-( (what the hell is up with Hathaway’s accent) 

 

 

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I don’t need to watch the trailer for this to be absolutely certain that everyone involved deserves jail time.

  • Downvote 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

That's an interesting view, and I'm sure everyone understands you want to get paid. I'm sure you are personally hugely proud of your work, and I'm sure you've done a fine job.

 

But from my personal perspective it's an entirely unnecessary remake of one of the most wonderful 80s comedies there is. So for that reason it can fuck off as far as I'm concerned without me needing to give it even a nanosecond of consideration, let alone the time of day. 

 

You may find that an unpleasant and unfair reaction, but it's my honest one. I don't for a second expect you to slag the film off naturally, but I'm not being paid by them so I can say what I think.

  • Downvote 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
35 minutes ago, ZOK said:

That's an interesting view, and I'm sure everyone understands you want to get paid. I'm sure you are personally hugely proud of your work, and I'm sure you've done a fine job.

 

But from my personal perspective it's an entirely unnecessary remake of one of the most wonderful 80s comedies there is. So for that reason it can fuck off as far as I'm concerned without me needing to give it even a nanosecond of consideration, let alone the time of day. 

 

You may find that an unpleasant and unfair reaction, but it's my honest one. I don't for a second expect you to slag the film off naturally, but I'm not being paid by them so I can say what I think.

 

 

I don't find it unpleasant or unfair at all. It's not a million miles away from my opinion about the majority of Superhero movies. Entertainment is entirely subjective, and I'm certainly not going to try and convince you that it's a film you'll enjoy, because I don't know what you enjoy. If you're a regular poster in this sub-forum, chances are a broad female-led Hollywood comedy remake isn't top of your list.

 

'Unnecessary'... That's an interesting word. Of course, one could argue that no films are necessary, they are simple entertainment after all.

Not me though, I fucking love movies.
 

Unnecessary suggests the question; Why make this when Dirty Rotten Scoundrels exists?

DRS is a movie many of us love. Most of us saw it when we were kids or teenagers.

The thing is, Dirty Rotten Scoundrels is a remake. The original telling was Bedtime Story, a 1964 flick starring Marlon Brando and David Niven.

 

The vast majority of kids/teenagers/young people back then didn't watch movies from 1964. They weren't even aware of films from 1964 (I'm using the pronoun 'they' as I suspect there's one or two peeps in here who absolutely did watch movies from the 50's and 60's, e.g. I watched the old Stagecoach westerns with my Granddad). 

And the same is true of young people today, they don't watch movies from the 80's. In our test screenings and research, we discovered that about 80% of people under 30 hadn't seen Dirty Rotten Scoundrels, and more than half hadn't even heard of it.

 

Don't get me wrong, I would love it if the youth started watching 80's movies, they're missing out on some proper classics. Imagine discounting Beverly Hills Cop because it's 'old'.

But they won't. So to bring them a great story in a medium they would enjoy, in the same way Dirty Rotten Scoundrels brought us a remake of a story we could fall in love with... I'm gonna push back against the term 'Unnecessary'.

 

I'm also not naive. This movie exists solely because MGM think they can make money from it. Unfortunately that is true of all Hollywood, and always has been. Dirty Rotten Scoundrels only ever existed because MGM thought they could make money from it. 

 

  • Upvote 5

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, Pants McSkill said:

 

 

I don't find it unpleasant or unfair at all. It's not a million miles away from my opinion about the majority of Superhero movies. Entertainment is entirely subjective, and I'm certainly not going to try and convince you that it's a film you'll enjoy, because I don't know what you enjoy. If you're a regular poster in this sub-forum, chances are a broad female-led Hollywood comedy remake isn't top of your list.

 

'Unnecessary'... That's an interesting word. Of course, one could argue that no films are necessary, they are simple entertainment after all.

Not me though, I fucking love movies.
 

Unnecessary suggests the question; Why make this when Dirty Rotten Scoundrels exists?

DRS is a movie many of us love. Most of us saw it when we were kids or teenagers.

The thing is, Dirty Rotten Scoundrels is a remake. The original telling was Bedtime Story, a 1964 flick starring Marlon Brando and David Niven.

 

The vast majority of kids/teenagers/young people back then didn't watch movies from 1964. They weren't even aware of films from 1964 (I'm using the pronoun 'they' as I suspect there's one or two peeps in here who absolutely did watch movies from the 50's and 60's, e.g. I watched the old Stagecoach westerns with my Granddad). 

And the same is true of young people today, they don't watch movies from the 80's. In our test screenings and research, we discovered that about 80% of people under 30 hadn't seen Dirty Rotten Scoundrels, and more than half hadn't even heard of it.

 

Don't get me wrong, I would love it if the youth started watching 80's movies, they're missing out on some proper classics. Imagine discounting Beverly Hills Cop because it's 'old'.

But they won't. So to bring them a great story in a medium they would enjoy, in the same way Dirty Rotten Scoundrels brought us a remake of a story we could fall in love with... I'm gonna push back against the term 'Unnecessary'.

 

I'm also not naive. This movie exists solely because MGM think they can make money from it. Unfortunately that is true of all Hollywood, and always has been. Dirty Rotten Scoundrels only ever existed because MGM thought they could make money from it. 

 

 

I've bolded the pertinent part, because that's exactly why I use the word.

 

To your response, I agree with where you go, but entirely disagree with the 'research' reasoning. No-one here is trying to bring back the spirit of DRS to a new audience! I think a much more honest answer would be that the majority of people funding films are creatively bankrupt, and they believe ripping off an old and proven classic will make them money. The research was conducted to ascertain the likelihood of that belief being true, and mitigate risk.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
6 minutes ago, ZOK said:

I think a much more honest answer would be that the majority of people funding films are creatively bankrupt, and they believe ripping off an old and proven classic will make them money. The research was conducted to ascertain the likelihood of that belief being true, and mitigate risk.

 

Which explains exactly why Dirty Rotten Scoundrels was made. 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 minutes ago, ZOK said:

 

I've bolded the pertinent part, because that's exactly why I use the word.

 

To your response, I agree with where you go, but entirely disagree with the 'research' reasoning. No-one here is trying to bring back the spirit of DRS to a new audience!

 

I am! As is the Director, the Director of Photography, the Producer and Rebel herself. Not just the spirit of DRS, but the spirit of 80s comedies in general. They had style and wonderful soundtracks, great camera work and nuanced performances. I want more of that in my comedies, and I want to bring more of that to audiences.

Case in point - I spent fucking MONTHS with the director working out the soundtrack to this film. We absolutely did not want 'generic current RnB star' all over it. And I love the soundtrack, it's different and quirky, and mixes contemporary tracks that aren't what you hear everywhere else with an amazing score - which came from us working with a genius composer who also wanted to bring the spirit of 80's comedies to audiences.

 

 

  • Upvote 8

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

If I remember correctly, DRS was about the tension between the two trying to work together whilst simultaneously trying to con each other. With the plot twisting this way and that as their plans and back stabbing unfurled (it’s been a long while since I saw it).

 

 I didn’t get that at all from the trailer. It seemed solely focused on the ‘female solidarity’ angle.

 

Is that an accurate of the film as a whole or does it also see them trying to outsmart each other?

 

I love a good twisty-turny comedy and last years Game Night set a high bar for that.

 

The trailer did make my laugh a few times so I’m cautiously optimistic.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
21 minutes ago, Pants McSkill said:

 

I am! As is the Director, the Director of Photography, the Producer and Rebel herself. Not just the spirit of DRS, but the spirit of 80s comedies in general. They had style and wonderful soundtracks, great camera work and nuanced performances. I want more of that in my comedies, and I want to bring more of that to audiences.

Case in point - I spent fucking MONTHS with the director working out the soundtrack to this film. We absolutely did not want 'generic current RnB star' all over it. And I love the soundtrack, it's different and quirky, and mixes contemporary tracks that aren't what you hear everywhere else with an amazing score - which came from us working with a genius composer who also wanted to bring the spirit of 80's comedies to audiences.

 

 

 

That's fair enough then - I hope you succeeded in your efforts, and I apologise for being so dismissive.

  • Upvote 6

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Cheers Zok! It'll be for the audiences to decide if we managed it. 

And no need to apologise. like I said earlier, I really doubt this is a film for you, or that many people in here. While I'd love as many people as people to watch it, life's short and there's a fuckton of amazing things to watch out there that you already know you're more likely to love. When I'm two seasons behind on Better Call Saul, it's tough to get excited about Fast and Furious 8.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, DukeOfEarlsfield said:

If I remember correctly, DRS was about the tension between the two trying to work together whilst simultaneously trying to con each other. With the plot twisting this way and that as their plans and back stabbing unfurled (it’s been a long while since I saw it).

 

 I didn’t get that at all from the trailer. It seemed solely focused on the ‘female solidarity’ angle.

 

Is that an accurate of the film as a whole or does it also see them trying to outsmart each other?

 

 

I saw Rebel trying to take over in the trailer. It's pretty much a guaranteed staple of any film with con artists in.

 

Still one of my favourite stories to tell though.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

×

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue. Use of this website is subject to our Privacy Policy, Terms of Use, and Guidelines.