Jump to content

Google Stadia - “being buried in a deep hole next to Google Circles and the rest”


footle
 Share

Recommended Posts

I personally think the 3080 tier pricing is pretty good. £15 a month gets you a top tier graphics card which in today's market is thousands of pounds, not really available anyway and is not top tier 1-2 years away. It also means I can dip in and out of top tier graphics.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just for 4k HDR streaming at the moment I think. All other clients max out at 1440p 120fps right now but I presume that's something Nvidia will fix. Google did a similar thing originally with Chromecast Ultra but eventually got browser and app support up to 4k HDR 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, dreamylittledream said:


The 3080 tier is ridiculously pricey for the games that are available so not really a fair comparison.

 

I’ve had the standard paid tier since it launched as it was a way of letting my kids play PC games on their weaker laptops and my general impression is it’s decent (much better than Xcloud for example) but still spotty on Wi-Fi (my Wi-Fi is not great admittedly) where as Stadia is almost always rock solid.

 

I’d have knocked in on the head a while ago had I not got 6 months free with my new laptop as it’s not longer really used that much and the number of games missing is frustrating. It’s a good service but it’s still a long way from being preferable to playing natively or indeed choosing it over Stadia if you have the game on that platform.

Sorry, I should have been clearer. The announcement of the 3080 tier was the headline grabber recently but they also introduced a bunch of enhancements for the existing tiers which improved their performance and they've added resolution upscaling to the PC and Mac apps. It seems better to me at least. 

 

I'd have probably cancelled my subscription as I don't use it much but I am grandfathered in to the founders edition pricing. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, ZOK said:

Right…so if I wanted that 4K HDR quality on my telly I’d need this Shield, but if I was playing via my Mac I wouldn’t?

 

You can only play up to 1440p @ 120 FPS on everything other than the Shield right now (e.g. your Mac). 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

All as expected isn’t it? Looks like I’ll get another year out of it and then it’s done.

 

I wish either Sony or Microsoft would buy it off them and launch an ‘online console’ with their existing games, that would just be perfect.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thinking more about that article, the only real question for me is how long it stays accessible. I’ve pretty much zero interest in them adding new games to the service…they could simply add four new games a month from the existing library into the Pro tier and I’d be well served for years, and be getting my money’s worth.
 

Even if it’s limping on it’s not going to make any real difference to me - hopefully by the time they do switch it off Microsoft have got X-Cloud up to scratch, because I think that is probably going to be more attractive to me than GeForce as an equivalent. I’m guessing that it will have a friendlier front end at least!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

There’s nothing in that statement that conflicts with the article, obviously no-one really knows the internal intent but it reads equally well as a confirmation. Exciting to find out I’m a ‘Stadian’ though I guess! :sherlock:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, footle said:

The thing that surprised me from Googles results was that they report losses from their cloud division, whereas Microsoft and Amazon treat it as a major profit centre. Corporate accounting at its finest?

Google's playing catch-up in Cloud. I wouldn't be surprised if that's true.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Assuming they can actually sell the platform on a whitelabel basis I'd imagine there's very little additional cost to continuing the Stadia store. It actually makes sense from a game developer's perspective too as you have a choice of being your own store, but there are costs in that, or you can just use the Stadia platform (friends lists, chat etc. etc.) directly. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just read the article on Ars, interesting that Phil Harrison hasn't mentioned anything about Stadia for a long time now and appears to have effectively been demoted and sidelined.  Less that 12 months before its in the google graveyard?

 

https://arstechnica.com/gadgets/2022/02/deprioritized-google-stadia-to-pivot-to-google-stream-white-label-service/

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 05/02/2022 at 09:31, footle said:

The thing that surprised me from Googles results was that they report losses from their cloud division, whereas Microsoft and Amazon treat it as a major profit centre. Corporate accounting at its finest?

 

Which major clients does Google's Cloud division provide service for? You can name plenty for both AWS and Azure, They also lost a shitload last year, so clearly aren't growing fast enough to get to the scale needed to compete with their main competition yet. The rate of loss making is slowing so they'll stop being a money sink in a few years time if they can maintain their rate of growth.

 

But much like other too big to fail Tech, they can afford to keep plugging the hole for as long as it takes to secure their bit of this very lucrative pie.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Yeah it's a good article which neatly lays out all the issues and broken promises Google made. I was one of the people who was sold by their reveal presentation, or at least open to its potential. Unfortunately half of the stuff in that presentation turned out to be outright false, or vastly under what they promised. With the comparisons in the article, it seems like other streaming services have a much more robust and long term plan than Google had, and those companies are now seeing the benefit of their investment. What baffles me is how the higher ups at Google were so uneducated and seemingly naïve about the amount of money in the games industry and the investment required to compete. Its a tech company for god sake!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue. Use of this website is subject to our Privacy Policy, Terms of Use, and Guidelines.