Jump to content
IGNORED

Nintendo Switch


Not Thread Owner

Recommended Posts

15 hours ago, HarryBizzle said:

You're saying that he is misrepresenting his opinion in order to "stir something up," is "looking for an angle" and that he is somehow trying to get his "content" (a tweet. He hasn't reviewed the device for Kotaku.) noticed by doing this.

 

i.e. that he is misrepresenting his opinion in order to generate clicks and if he were instead, honestly representing his opinions that wouldn't be an interesting enough "angle."

 

You also keep saying that this is somehow part of his job and that rather than trying to write a genuinely interesting or informative piece, the way to succeed in writing is just to "stir something up."

So, I *didn't* say he was lying or making anything up then. And *you're* inserting the word 'misrepresenting' everywhere to make it look like I did, when in fact it's not in any of my posts (which is why you can't surround it with ""). I said, and I stand by it, that as a journalist he (as is perfectly reasonable) was looking for an angle on Switch news that might just generate some traffic and discussion.

 

I'd appreciate if you'd at least acknowledge that inferring I was a liar that needed to 'backpedal' was wrong and incorrect on your part - especially since you got so antsy about me possibly (but in fact actually not at all) doing it to somebody else. Just asking for some consistency on your end please.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, eddydonuk said:

Is anyone genuinely worried enough about this joycon issue to cancel their pre-order?

Only, I suspect, those people that placed a pre-order knowing full well they'd come up with a reason to cancel it closer to the time anyway.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, eddydonuk said:

Is anyone genuinely worried enough about this joycon issue to cancel their pre-order?

 

Yes. I haven't cancelled yet though. I'm hoping Nintendo will release a statement or something today. If it can be solved via a firmware update then I'm still in. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 hours ago, Stanley said:

childish

 

 

11 hours ago, Broker said:

Universal acclaim aside from the issues with the left joycon and the undercooked UI and stuff. 

 

Feel free to be excited. You can even be a cunt to people who aren't excited. If you're going to be as smug as you are though, you could really do with actually being funny. Or interesting.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

For anybody who's worried about the Joy-Con issue, it seems the problem can be fixed. An eagle eyed member from NeoGaf had this to say:

Quote

Since I have nothing better to do I tried to look into any FCC filings for the Joy-Cons. If HAC-015 (https://fccid.io/BKEHAC015) is the left Joy-Con, which seems likely, then we already have some information about the maximum output power.


http://i.imgur.com/HgW09v8.png
This suggests the output power is around 3-4 dBm, which is in-line with what you would expect from a Bluetooth Class2 device (maximum output power of 4dBm). While Bluetooth technically allows up to 20dBm output power for Class1 devices, most chips today will allow up to 10dBm output power. This is informally known as Class1.5 and is common since FCC does not require SAR testing for any devices with an output power below 10dBm.

The good news is then that Nintendo will most likely be able to increase the output power by around 6dB, which should in theory give around twice the current range. This will also not negatively affect the Battery life significantly, as the chip will dynamically change the output power as required. So the additional power will only be used when it otherwise would lose the connection.

The bad news is that the Joy-Cons will have to be re-certified, which means that Nintendo will likely not be able to have this done as a day-one firmware update unless they already caught this issue ahead of time and are in the process of fixing it already. (They will also likely have to measure SAR as well even if they are below the 10dBm limit, since Canada recently lowered the limit where you do not have to measure SAR to 6dBm).

The thing that surprises me however is that 4dBm should absolutely be enough power for the type of environments shown in the video above. Deliberately covering the entire device with both hands will probably always be a problem. The antenna is probably quite narrowband so doing that will likely detune it as well causing even more losses than what you get anyway from the absorption in the hands. But simply placing the device behind the back and breaking line-of-sight? When you are indoors and only a few meters away from the main console, this should absolutely not be a problem. So unless there is something really strange going on with their antennas (like if they didn't account for the detuning that might happen when you hold the device normally) then it might actually be possible that the real Joy-Cons are using lower power than they are certified for, either due to a firmware bug or because someone though it would increase battery life (it really shouldn't). In that case, it would be fairly simple to issue a new firmware to increase the power.

http://www.neogaf.com/forum/showpost.php?p=230923326&postcount=947

TL;DR: Nintendo can fix this with a firmware update. Possibly on launch day or close to launch.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue. Use of this website is subject to our Privacy Policy, Terms of Use, and Guidelines.