Jump to content
IGNORED

PlayStation 4 Console Thread


mushashi

Recommended Posts

Can't see it as being £350 plus. I hope for 330 max and less than Xbox. The PS3 launch hurt sony and they learnt some lessons, plus Kinect must cost a lot to produce, given its an updated version of a standalone product that cost £100 (or was it £130?)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Can't see it as being £350 plus. I hope for 330 max and less than Xbox. The PS3 launch hurt sony and they learnt some lessons, plus Kinect must cost a lot to produce, given its an updated version of a standalone product that cost £100 (or was it £130?)

The original Kinect IIRC cost a tiny amount to build, they just made a massive profit off it.

Edit- $56 of parts, sold at $150.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Kinect 2 has enough CPU grunt inside to need active cooling (i.e. a fan). That implies there's a non-trivial amount of chips, more than the first one, certainly.

Could you put that in terms of transistors? Five? Six hundred? Four octillion?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The fan will be good. It'll just randomly spin up when the Xbox is supposedly switched off and you know that it's watching and has seen something it likes.

'It's getting hot in herre'

Could you put that in terms of transistors? Five? Six hundred? Four octillion?

Glyndwr might be the amazing tech guy, but not even he is up on the rocket science stuff.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I can't see how the PS4 Eye would only cost $12-20 if the original Kinect parts cost $56..

It's essentially similar components - 2x (superior 720p @ 60Hz) cameras, a 4 channel mic array and a tilt motor..

New Kinect is undoubtedly more (though it does eliminate the motor) but it's difficult to see the new PS4 one being cheaper than old Kinect by 2/3rds..

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I can't see how the PS4 Eye would only cost $12-20 if the original Kinect costs $56 to make..

It's essentially similar components - 2x (superior 720p @ 60Hz) cameras, a 4 channel mic array and a tilt motor..

The original Kinect probably still had more technology in than the new PSEye, plus that motor added to the cost. PSEye is just a pair of shitty rez cameras and a plastic case, Sony probably have millions of 1-2MP cameras lying around in the stores as well, can't imagine the R&D costs added much.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The original Kinect probably still had more technology in than the new PSEye, plus that motor added to the cost. PSEye is just a pair of shitty rez cameras and a plastic case, Sony probably have millions of 1-2MP cameras lying around in the stores as well, can't imagine the R&D costs added much.

Nope, the Kinect really was dumb as a bag of rocks and relied on the Xbox to do the heavy lifting. However $50 of HD cameras a few years ago is probably next to nothing now, thanks to mobiles, and likewise microphones and audio processors. Throw in no motor and $20 is entirely doable.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Nope, the Kinect really was dumb as a bag of rocks and relied on the Xbox to do the heavy lifting. However $50 of HD cameras a few years ago is probably next to nothing now, thanks to mobiles, and likewise microphones and audio processors. Throw in no motor and $20 is entirely doable.

Oh boy, I thought it had some interesting tech shoved inside it, judging by all the homebrew stuff it could do, but the games didn't manage to show it in its best light,

I know nothing, Jon Snow :(

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Orig Kinect cameras will have been very cheap at the time too - only 640x480

PS4 Eye is something like 1280x800

Kinect 2 is 1920x1080

Plus there are pics that show the Eye tilted up and down.. implies a motor in that end section that moves the rest of it..

image_297886_620.jpg

I just reckon $12-20 is VERY optimistic for the cost of the thing..

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Nope, the Kinect really was dumb as a bag of rocks and relied on the Xbox to do the heavy lifting. However $50 of HD cameras a few years ago is probably next to nothing now, thanks to mobiles, and likewise microphones and audio processors. Throw in no motor and $20 is entirely doable.

The original Kinect was also dumbed down from the initial hardware iterations of the device, it did originally have its own onboard processing, they gimped it for the money.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Plus there are pics that show the Eye tilted up and down.. implies a motor in that end section that moves the rest of it..

image_297886_620.jpg

I just reckon $12-20 is VERY optimistic for the cost of the thing..

It implies to me that the camera swivels by hand at that point, just like PSEye. I'd be very, very surprised if that was a tilt motor in there.

playstation-4-eye.jpg?w=680&h=420

The USB lead on PSEye used to drag the camera off tilt sometimes as well, I figured that's the reason it's at the end now, so it doesn't pull the camera angle down as it drops.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Orig Kinect cameras will have been very cheap at the time too - only 640x480

PS4 Eye is something like 1280x800

Kinect 2 is 1920x1080

Plus there are pics that show the Eye tilted up and down.. implies a motor in that end section that moves the rest of it..

I just reckon $12-20 is VERY optimistic for the cost of the thing..

AFAIK there's no motor, it just tilts about by hand. It's just a pair of wide-angle 1MP cameras with a quad mic array not far removed from the original Eye. Given the original Eye sold for $25 I doubt the new one will cost more than about $15 to make.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Oh boy, I thought it had some interesting tech shoved inside it, judging by all the homebrew stuff it could do, but the games didn't manage to show it in its best light,

I know nothing, Jon Snow :(

The problem with the homebrew stuff is that while amazing, it only works 8/10 times or isn't very polished. To release something on xbox kinect it would have to work 10/10 and be polished (9/10 for an MS published game).

It might not be so bad with this new kinect, as the problem was with the USB 2.0 not being able to feed data to the machine fast enough so the resolutions and detail were a bit crap. I'm just not too sure what developers are going to do with that extra detail. I think you can get a lot out of it if you're willing to put the time in, but publishers aren't going to let dev teams do that when what sells games are screenshots and tried-and-tested formulas.

...so looking at other camera tech, like Samsung TVs, Playstation Eyes and even cameras on phones, will be able to do what Kinect does even if Kinect could technically do a little bit more.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue. Use of this website is subject to our Privacy Policy, Terms of Use, and Guidelines.