Jump to content
IGNORED

Football Thread 2011/2012


SMD

Recommended Posts

Not in the Muslim lands at least. Or at least not in Egypt. Though you could put it in there if you wanted to.

Indeed, it's molasses that goes in there, but you're still smoking away - it's just not quite as bad as cigarettes.

... which is Tobacco mixed with molasses to give it flavour.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It always amazes me that Darren Bent has had nearly £60 million in transfer fees spent on him over his career. But then it always surprises me that he's actually got a pretty decent scoring record. Charlton, Villa and Sunderland are all pretty much a goal every couple of games. Even spurs, where he wasnt considered a hit, he got a goal every 3 games. Some teams would be happy if their strikers were doing that. Odd really as whenever I've seen him play, he's seemed completely unremarkable, and not someone who'd be a consistent goalscorer.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's probably cause he's not flashy, doesn't dance round the defence or hit 30/40 years screamers. But he does whats asked I him and that's score goals. Does he have a reputation of having a bad attitude at all cause I dunno why clubs wouldnt want to keep hold of him?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Time for Liverpool to man up and sort suarez out, either he played them all for fools making them believe his side of things and allowing the club to release THAT statement, or the club knew what he had said/done in the incident and still decided to stick by him :S

If suarez lied to the club, his teamates, getting them to wear the t-shirts etc then how can he play for them again?? And if the club knew what he did how can they ever defend him??

I think it's dreadful that a great Club like Liverpool has been put in this position. Suarez is a cheat, a liar and a racist and I think they should sack him.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Before all of you finish yourselves off to the news, have you actually read the document and y'know, thought about it yourselves?

I read about 40 pages or so of it yesterday, but didn't finish it, what with it being New Year's Eve. I skimmed the parts I didn't get to read in full though, and nothing I've read makes me think the panel was wrong.

I've got tonight free though, so I'll be reading the rest of it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I read about 40 pages or so of it yesterday, but didn't finish it, what with it being New Year's Eve. I skimmed the parts I didn't get to read in full though, and nothing I've read makes me think the panel was wrong.

I've got tonight free though, so I'll be reading the rest of it.

Wait till you get to around paragraph 115, it takes a turn for the worse before the last 30 pages particularly nose dive.

The FA's timeline is already starting to be disproved, by the way, by video evidence...on Youtube.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue. Use of this website is subject to our Privacy Policy, Terms of Use, and Guidelines.