Jump to content
IGNORED

Taken - Liam Neeson


Goose

Recommended Posts

I enjoyed it best by just going with the flow. Didn't think about it too much, just enjoyed Liam Neeson kicking some serious ass - with that darker edge that meant he'd happily kill a room and half full of people rather than just wait outside and kidnap the one he wanted once he'd found out who he was. The second you look deeper into the film and logic it does fall apart very quickly with chance and coincidence.

It's what, in some regards, how I picture Fleming's Bond when I read the books rather than see the films. Neeson is utterly committed to getting his daughter back, he doesn't care if you like what he does or think he goes too far, he's going to get her back, no matter what the cost!

Rock on!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

She was ODed on heroin by her captors, didn't you notice him looking at the syringe and all the injection marks on her arm? I thought the idea of that scene was that it showed him his daughter's possible fate and pushed him even harder.

It seemed a bit silly though, she's surely a valuable commodity in their sex trade so I don't imagine they'd be so careless as to let her die, especially so quickly. It was just convenient to ramp up the horror. Similarly, the 90 hours (or whatever it was) was totally arbitrary, if anything the scariest thing about the sex trade is that she could have been stuck in that horrible life for years and he'd never know whether she was still alive.

His brutality is the manifestation of his love for his daughter. That's how fucked up he is. He buys her a karaoke machine, gets her a chance to meet her favourite pop star, and nails a guy to a chair before hooking him up to the Paris electrical system. He's not meant to be entirely good or likeable- he's quite the antihero at times, bit like Rorschach in Watchmen.

YEah I agree, but with such a potentially interesting character they could have developed those points a bit. It seemed like they didn't really want the audience to think about that. I guess I was just intrigued by the potential for a more serious film, the sex trade world could have been really interesting to explore, and so could Neeson's character... but it would have made for a very depressing, completely different film.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

i really enjoyed this film, the only part where it was let down was when

he was captured in the posh flat after watching his daughter get auctioned, why oh why would some kind of villain with henchmen not pay for silencers for pistols so they could shoot him in the face, instead of suspending him from steam pipes by his arms so they can dispose of him discretely

other than that one small 10 second glitch it was great.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It seemed a bit silly though, she's surely a valuable commodity in their sex trade so I don't imagine they'd be so careless as to let her die, especially so quickly. It was just convenient to ramp up the horror. Similarly, the 90 hours (or whatever it was) was totally arbitrary, if anything the scariest thing about the sex trade is that she could have been stuck in that horrible life for years and he'd never know whether she was still alive.

YEah I agree, but with such a potentially interesting character they could have developed those points a bit. It seemed like they didn't really want the audience to think about that. I guess I was just intrigued by the potential for a more serious film, the sex trade world could have been really interesting to explore, and so could Neeson's character... but it would have made for a very depressing, completely different film.

It is interesting that during the phone conversation, he tells them that if they let his daughter go, that will be the end of the matter. There is the implication that he sees the friend as expendable. It added to my enjoyment of the film that he really isn't a conventional hero, just a very violent dad.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Who would win in a fight John Matrix or Bryan Mills?

To be fair when I came out of the cinema I loved this film and thought of it as a 21st century/European version of Commando and absolutely loved it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Who would win in a fight John Matrix or Bryan Mills?

To be fair when I came out of the cinema I loved this film and thought of it as a 21st century/European version of Commando and absolutely loved it.

Matrix would win no contest.

While Bryan Mills is busy listing his particular set of skills, Matrix would just shoot him in the head.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Who would win in a fight John Matrix or Bryan Mills?

To be fair when I came out of the cinema I loved this film and thought of it as a 21st century/European version of Commando and absolutely loved it.

It's totally a 00s-era Commando.

I reckon it'd be a close fight, but in the end they'd unite to fight a common enemy.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I watched this the other day on Virgin's movies on demand thingy.

I enjoyed it lots, but having read this thread I expected it to be the second coming of action films, and to be honest, I don't think it is.

The action seemed subdued somehow. I can't really put my finger on it, but I felt it was a bit... tame. Like a shorter version of 24 or something.

Having said that, of course, I'm looking forward to the inevitable Taken 2.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

Just saw this tonight on blu-ray. I can't say I was terribly impressed. We all seem to be in agreement that the story is rubbish, but if that's the case I would expect really good action, which I just didn't think it delivered. I mean the action was pretty good, but in a film with such a paper-thin plot I would expect great.

Also, I did kind of have to take objection to what little plot was there - "insanely over-protective paranoid father proved ultimately correct" is not much of a moral. Also, every single bad guy in the film is based on French racial and zenophobic stereotypes. Dodgy eastern europeans, lascivious arab perverts and moneygrabbing American capitalists. Pretty much the only French guy in the whole film is a corrupt lazy workshy who's let the foreigners destroy his country, unlike the old days! It could have been written by Jean-Marie Le Pen.

To be honest, I'm probably just a bit disappointed that the ending wasn't like

video. It would have been amazing.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

I finally saw this and was really disappointed after reading all the praise on here.

The set-up was really dull, Vallance was embarrsingly bad, Neeson looked bored out of his mind throughout the film, it was xenophobic, and even the action just felt 'Bauer-light' and it seemed a bit boring.

On the plus side - the running time was about right and the scene in the house with the red door was good.

Amanda's death seemed a bit strange.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Didn't this get really bad reviews? Word of mouth is that it's good but I've only heard that off people who will watch almost anything.

It's not going to change your world, but if you want to see Liam Neeson bang heads together in some brisk action scenes, it's good value. People moan about the boring setup, but it's essential, and gives rise to a great speech from Neeson on the phone, before he nips off to France to tear it apart. Like any action movie or blockbuster, you'll find it divides people.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

People moan about the boring setup, but it's essential, and gives rise to a great speech from Neeson on the phone, before he nips off to France to tear it apart.

It wasn't essential, though. They could easily have done that in 10 minutes or less and made the film shorter.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It wasn't essential, though. They could easily have done that in 10 minutes or less and made the film shorter.

I thought it was about right. And at 93 minutes, they really didn't need to make the film any shorter. A 20 minute setup is nothing.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It wasn't essential, though. They could easily have done that in 10 minutes or less and made the film shorter.

Maybe not essential but the right thing to do, Spielberg didn't unleash Jaws on the crew until at least an hour* into the movie.

*I'm guessing here before you go all internets on me.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Taken has to be appaulded in this modern day film environment.

it pulls no punches, and hasnt got any soppy shit in it, reallly at all.

this. i have watched it a few times and find it immensely entertaining because it has a minimal setup then hits the fan. the thing is, the bootings Neeson hands out like so many Werther's Originals are pretty sharp, sometimes mean, and yes, boring because sometimes all you need is a swift punch in the face not some c-c-c-combo breaker. i still laugh when he

shoots the dude in the back in the whorehouse

or

shoots that French cunt's wife in the arm

. he's thoroughly narked his daughter has been nabbed, so does what needs to be done.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I watched this yesterday with the mother of all hangovers, thought it was absolute shite. I wanted Commando style trash, I got a big pile of shite with a very boring story, very uninspired action and acting and nothing of note whatsoever to recommend it. It's bad but it's not bad enough, just the same old crap you've seen a million times before.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue. Use of this website is subject to our Privacy Policy, Terms of Use, and Guidelines.