Jump to content
IGNORED

The old Man Utd Thread


ThePixelbarks

Recommended Posts

i would take mata and fred off, get rashford and lingard on

 

and...why does the ball look like a china bowl!?

 

edit: so at 72 mins, we have one shot on target...

 

im predicting 4 nill to liverpool on sunday...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 12/12/2018 at 21:15, 5R7 said:

i would take mata and fred off, get rashford and lingard on

 

and...why does the ball look like a china bowl!?

 

edit: so at 72 mins, we have one shot on target...

 

im predicting 4 nill to liverpool on sunday...

Liverpool will gt a penalty because Liverpool. Milner will score.

But then Rashford or Herrera, and then Mata will score and we'll win 2-1

 

Gabriel Jesus scoring 2 today shows that anything can happen!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, tbb said:

Liverpool will gt a penalty because Liverpool. Milner will score.

But then Rashford or Herrera, and then Mata will score and we'll win 2-1

 

Gabriel Jesus scoring 2 today shows that anything can happen!

 

Statistically improbable ;) 

 

United are winning though, we are missing three defenders with Milner filling in. I can see it being 1-0 to you lot. Either the much maligned Pogba, Fellaini or Rashford to score it. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 13/12/2017 at 22:52, 5R7 said:

gents, ive been saying for a while, we are shocking without pogba. We clearly need to get another midfielder in in Jan....'who however...well...

 

It's a little unfair but I've just wondered into this thread for the first time in a while and this was the first new post.

 

I'd say times have changed, any thoughts?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, feltmonkey said:

I'm following text updates in work. What's the verdict on that disallowed goal? Did Lukaku touch the ball? 

No. He was way offside anyway.

 

Too easy for Liverpool, as we all expected. A simple 3-0 I reckon.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3-1 maybe. 

 

My point about Lukaku is that if he didn't touch it, it doesn't matter if he was offside or not. Interfering with play these days specifically means touching the ball. Perhaps he was interfering with an opponent. 

 

A lot seems to have happened since then anyway, so a bit of a non-issue? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, feltmonkey said:

3-1 maybe. 

 

My point about Lukaku is that if he didn't touch it, it doesn't matter if he was offside or not. Interfering with play these days specifically means touching the ball. Perhaps he was interfering with an opponent. 

 

A lot seems to have happened since then anyway, so a bit of a non-issue? 

The commentators said something about his intention to go for the ball. Not sure if that’s in the rule book or not though.

 

How was our goal then? I went in the kitchen to check on the dinner!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

27 minutes ago, feltmonkey said:

3-1 maybe. 

 

My point about Lukaku is that if he didn't touch it, it doesn't matter if he was offside or not. Interfering with play these days specifically means touching the ball. Perhaps he was interfering with an opponent. 

 

A lot seems to have happened since then anyway, so a bit of a non-issue? 

 

Here it is if you still haven't seen it.

 

https://www.clippituser.tv/c/zkxemx 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, JPL said:

19 points behind the leaders at this stage of the season has to be seen as completely unacceptable from the board. It has to be.

 

Mourinho gone by the morning please.

 

Still don't see him going just yet. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue. Use of this website is subject to our Privacy Policy, Terms of Use, and Guidelines.