Jump to content


  • Content Count

  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by jonny_rat

  1. Utterly absurd up call it a 'cash-in.' The first all in VR solution to market, launching at £50 more than the PSVR did (no console needed), controllers included, no base stations, proper inside out tracking with 6dof.. and yes, while it's all about the games, the games need time to port to an android-based system by devs. It's a new platform, so you have your usual day-one gamble on trusting whether the support will come, but a cash-in? Cripes.
  2. Stuff like this is fantastic: https://mobile.twitter.com/vr_oasis/status/1124371941345959936 (When you pass through the boundary grid, as set by you, it clearly shows that you've gone out of it, before switching to the external camera)
  3. You can also stream direct to a phone, so if you can hook your phone up to the TV via HDMI that should work too.
  4. Quest and Rift games are running on genuinely different hardware (the quest is android based) so it's definitely a positive that they've encouraged cross buy between them. Yes, it'd be nicer if the two main platforms - at least - would play nice with each other. The problem with something like the knuckles controller is that any games built with the five-finger gestures in mind will have compatibility issues with other hardware, unless they've built workarounds into the dev tools (again, the oculus dev kit is does well with compatibility between different pieces of oculus; I dunno about the valve stuff).
  5. Aye, if there's one thing that Oculus have done quite (though not perfectly) well it's creating an ecosystem. Encouraging devs to enable cross buy between quest and rift apps/games was a good move.
  6. Hmm, I've got some concerns about the reliability of those straps. Giving the sensation of fully opening the hand is great and all, but I think it's going to lead to a few broken/flung controllers when the straps haven't been properly fixed. On paper, I think I prefer the touch controller approach: the grip/release control there is basically fine even with having to grip the bottom of the handle. Would have to see if it feels different in-game. Edit: fantastic for industrial applications though..
  7. Last boss down!
  8. Unfortunately I don't think it's quite that simple; the bolded bit is definitely not a good way of looking at it. Accessibility options are one thing, but accessibility also needs consideration of core gameplay difficulty. Disabilities aren't just about having neat, discrete functional limitations: sometimes they have a general effect on cognitive or motor functions, which can make games without any difficulty settings extremely challenging. This article says it better than anywhere else I've seen: https://junkee.com/sekiro-game-difficulty/200666 It's also covered in the gaming accessibility guidelines: http://gameaccessibilityguidelines.com/allow-gameplay-to-be-fine-tuned-by-exposing-as-many-variables-as-possible/ (Edit: I'm re-reading this and I hope it doesn't sound patronising. Sorry. Just trying to dig into this issue about the relationship between 'options', accessibility and difficulty - certainly don't want to be telling you about your own experiences of disability. Have you read the IGN piece by Cherry Rae about working through Bloodborne with a disability? She sounds way better at it than I was, but experienced severe pain during long sessions)
  9. It's been awesome to see Ian Hamilton get some speaking time in various places about this https://junkee.com/sekiro-game-difficulty/200666 He's ridiculously reasonable on the topic (and still gets a load of shit online from git gudders) and he absolutely nails the problem with/resistance to widening access to From games:
  10. DoH down, but christ, that's the first time I've ever felt really frustrated by the camera in a From game.
  11. I've heard a few people get excited about Sekiro as a spiritual follow up to Tenchu, who've then been a bit deflated when they found out that it's a game with a souls-ish difficulty curve and combat focus!
  12. And therein lies the fuckup with Sekiro (and I say that as someone who absolutely loves the game). All the steps and lip-service to addressing accessibility and widening participation, and they appear to have gone the other way with it: not by design but by accident. That's at least partially why this debate has blown up in the last two weeks: lots of people have looked at the game, at the design philosophy that seems to have guided the expanded range of options (and don't get accessibility options mixed up with difficulty options here) and the better onboarding, and said "this is great, but it's not achieving your desired aims here." I think I've said elsewhere that I agree that Sekiro removes some of the difficulty compensation options (though nothing in Sekiro is as brutal as the opening hours of Bloodborne, where levelling and multiplayer are both blocked off). The 'time and time' again stuff From's games just seems to be the norm for many Japanese studios that work in quite an isolated way: you might think I'm reading into comments too much, but I think you're making a very big assumption in that they're comfortable with their current audience. Some of what they've said in interviews the last few years has sounded like frustration that their games never really break out of their sales brackets.
  13. They do want to: there are some really interesting bits that came out from interviews with From staff on working with Activision. They had no idea how to approach play testing (they handed all this over to the US Activision office), and didn't even feel confident about creating the tutorial section in Sekiro: all of that was guided by player data, and it was great. It also includes loads more accessibility/quality of life settings than did DS3. Again, this comes back to the idea that Miyazake and the Souls teams want to make hard games: in every quote about it, he's said that he wants to make games with challenges that players will initially fail, and then pass. Letting players tune the challenge is totally in line with that.
  14. All in the presentation. Be clear that there's an 'as intended' game mode. And to repeat what lots of others have said on the topic, 'difficulty modes' are a blunt, ineffective solution. A range of accessibility settings, plus celeste-style assist modes or gameplay modifiers are much better than getting the player to select easy, medium or hard.
  15. Because there's loads to love in Sekiro/souls apart from the combat. Because From would presumably like more sales. Because with relatively little effort, and zero impact on you, they could implement these changes.
  16. The thing that needs to be said over and over and over is that the core experience, curated by Miyazaki himself (if that's the case) and perfectly calibrated to represent a set challenge, does not need to change. You can hammer this home in the presentation: all the Halo games after ODST labelled Heroic as Heroic "the way Halo was meant to be played." Prevent players from changing the settings mid-game if you like (after a few levels), to discourage players from dialling the difficulty down when the going gets tough. This idea about catering for the masses is just wrong: letting other people tailor their experiences doesn't need to affect yours.
  17. I wrote this (maybe tl;dr) piece on this; the gist is that clarity of vision doesn't need to be sacrificed for either increasing accessibility or removing difficulty barriers. https://link.medium.com/jXHqVBRhNV
  18. There's one more tip for castle GSO that I only spotted from a speed run video:
  19. Not sure if this has been posted yet, but it's really good. Hits on a few really great points: one, that Sekiro is both the most accessible game From have ever made as well as maybe being the most punishing. And another, that accessibility is not the easiest thing to define and pin down: on one hand 'accessibility options' are a relatively uncontroversial addition, but if you want to accommodate a range of physical, sensory and mental ability you often need to allow players to tinker with the core game experience. https://uk.ign.com/articles/2019/04/05/sekiro-accessibility-in-games-is-about-far-more-than-difficulty
  20. I'm currently stuck there as well, but think I've got a bead on him. It's a bloody hard fight; absolutely no shortcuts with this one.
  21. I got a bit confused when reading your two posts together, because The Killing Joke also shows us a version of the character who is the result of a series of bad events; it's not just the acid that turns him into the joker. However, can see the concern, because if you take the acid bath away, you *just* have the life events being the catalyst, rather than this comic-book conceit of going mad because acid. KJ also manages it because it straight up addresses the question you're talking about, with the Joker trying to turn Gordon mad by inflicting life events on him too. And failing, so suggesting that there's something maybe wrong or deficient with him. I've just realised that Heath Ledger's Joker tries a very similar thing in TDK with the ferries. The film can manage this if it takes a similar approach. But a better way (for me) would be to show pre-Joker-Joker as a psychopath who is holding it together. An everyman/nice guy on the surface, but a lingering stench of something scary. I think this tweet is actually supposed to be a dig, but it's basically perfect:
  22. Absolutely this. I got him in the smaller area at the far end of the arena and basically souls'ed him to death without using block or deflection - dodge once or twice towards his back leg, couple of attacks, back to neutral. The upgraded firecracker is a little easier to use in this area too.
  23. jonny_rat

    Google Stadia

    The controller connecting directly to the data centre via wifi - not via bluetooth or radio to the device - is really interesting. Might have an impact on perceived latency too..
  24. jonny_rat

    Google Stadia

    That's if sticking with the current publisher model, though. This netflix-y model is probably not good for publishers at they currently stand: but the attraction to Google (and everyone else trying to get in on it) may well be to start acting like a publisher in the longer term, providing funding to developers to produce games exclusive to their service.
  25. A while back, I watched my nephews playing Fortnite on a TV setup with massive latency. I found it absolutely, completely unplayable; they didn't give a shit. And they were doing totally fine in the game too. I've played streaming services - even years back - that delivered smaller latency than that bloody TV setup. Which makes me think that streaming services have a good shot at working out for a lot of players, though there will always be people for who it's a total no-go. (I also fully expect to see stream-players viewed as casuals by local hardware players in the future, who call themselves the master race, etc)
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue. Use of this website is subject to our Privacy Policy, Terms of Use, and Guidelines.