Jump to content
rllmuk

jonny_rat

Members
  • Content Count

    5,964
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Recent Profile Visitors

4,655 profile views
  1. I went a bit mad and did the buy-2-years-of-live-and-convert-into-GP thing yesterday, despite not owning an XB1. Ended up with a subscription that runs out in April 2022 for £65 - so thanks to everyone on here who posted the method! Any good console-only deals likely to pop up for Black Friday? I don't have a 4k TV, so am guessing that the S is the best option given that the all digital seems to be weirdly overpriced..
  2. To focus on just one thing here, I think something like a dynamic boss-skip in a SB game would be a problematic half-way house solution. They're all about teaching patience and how to approach bosses and situations, etc - enable a boss skip and you just end up ferrying them to the next challenge which they'll find even more difficult because they didn't build up the experience from the last one. So presumably you'd end up in a situation where players were dying continually to bosses until they enabled the skip. We're coming back to some of the issues that were covered in the Sekiro thread, but I'd prefer to see a well-thought-through assist mode (preferably modes) in that type of game, with a load of accessibility options that let the player set their own terms and stick to them.
  3. Plenty of games without challenge or minimal challenge: Dear Esther, Everybody's Gone to the Rapture, Journey, etc. Arguably Life is Strange too: anything I've every heard from the developers suggests that they don't ever want players to be stuck or challenged by the game. The number of people who do watch a playthrough on Twitch is an argument for including zero-challenge modes, not against. Devs get to sell more copies to the people who just want to appreciate the story or atmosphere.
  4. I wonder how they'll handle the overworld when it gets to the later sequels/episodes/whatever-they'll-probably-never-come-out. The sensible thing to do would be to stick to the original implementation but god, I bet they'll end up trying to make it a 1-1 representation of the world, give you a vehicle from the off, lift it wholesale from FF15.
  5. I like the look of it, including the combat, but man, the sounds are a letdown. Some stilted voice acting, and disappointing that the music we've heard so far is mostly generic orchestras. None of the distinctive synthy-rock weirdness of the original; and whether that quirkiness was the result of working with the limitations of the PS1, it's just a bit depressing to have all those tunes sounding like they've had the melodies edged out in favour of Marvel-movie-ish orchestral bombast.
  6. Thanks all; this is useful stuff. From looking around, the CV1s and older Vives aren't cheap enough to justify the drawbacks; I was wondering if I might even be able to go for one of those and a Quest. For, you know, research purposes (in fairness a lot of the folk I want to work with are going to be targeting the Quest anyway, so I'll have to pick one up at some point). And ta @footle, excellent point about having the updated controllers. My one outstanding issue with the Rift S - is it really impossible to replace the foam or remove it to clean? If running playtests that thing is going to be a smelly boy. Use some kind of cover perhaps?
  7. I need a bit of advice here, and this seems like the thread to ask it in. I'm doing increasing amounts of work for VR content creators and devs, and because I've gone from working somewhere that had plenty of bits of VR stuff onsite to freelancing, I need to get in some kit at home. The main use of it for now will be keeping up with what's going on in terms of interaction design and good practice, but in the future I might need it to play dev builds or run testing sessions with users/players. What do I go for? The quest looks great, but I have a feeling I should get something tethered in terms of being able to run a wider selection on games/experiences/apps on it. I have a workable PC (with a 1070 and meeting the min spec, but the processor could do with a bump). The Rift S doesn't seem like a huge upgrade (though mixed reports here) - any bargains to be had on CV1s, or is there an active second hand market for them? I don't mind setting up the sensors too much.
  8. What interests me most about it is the opportunity to have some nice little twitchy, arcadey experiences on it. We've discussed whether this thing is going to be competing with mobile phones (I think it will in terms of competing for people's time, but not in the least in terms of market), and those types of games have always failed for me on mobile because they don't work well on a touchscreen. I think I'm surprisingly up for something absolutely tiny with physical buttons that lobs a new game at me every week. Probably it will appeal most to the beard-strokier end of games consumers. People who actually follow what each of these indie devs is up to. Edit: also, there's.. almost nothing hipstery in the copy of their site? If anything it was more straight laced than I was expecting.
  9. Look at this ridiculous thing. I love it a bit.
  10. There's got to be a market for slick experiences along those lines: lots of the ones available either have a slight whiff of being knocked up in five mins or come in at a slightly higher price. It'd be good to get in before someone like Headspace do it.
  11. Aye, I reckon those will come if devices like the Quest take off. I'm guessing - and happy to be corrected - that the market has been a bit too small to support the development costs and expertise needed to do good VR, but with more of them out there there should be more people willing to take a punt on smaller stuff.
  12. Mass Effect - put skip dialog text and select dialog option on different buttons (or require the player to hold the button for 1s to select an option). I think they may have sorted this in 3.
  13. I like this one. I work (a bit) in games user research and the goal is to identify issues and fixes that improve the player's experience while making minor or no changes to what the developer is aiming for, and this is a nice minimal fix. We primarily try to assume that devs had their own reasons for doing something a certain way. (Actually, that's not always the goal: later in the development lifecycle we're more interested in whether players appreciate features/mechanics, while earlier on we look mostly at usability and understanding issues.) In BB we might say, hey, are you sure you want players to be running around picking up health vials and ammo? If they did have their reasons, the limited stocks in BB were an example of a not-very-well-appreciated mechanic that probably could have been left in and fixed with usability tests and relevant tweaks. Maybe when they leave the hunters dream, players could be clearly shown their remaining stocks of vials and ammo, and given the chance to convert their remaining echoes into stocks on the loading screen. Maybe the doll could do that converting instead of buying them at the fountain dudes: and say, are you sure you want to level up, given that you've got no health vials? Just clarify the mechanic a bit and maybe it wouldn't have been so grating. Great thread @Timmo
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue. Use of this website is subject to our Privacy Policy, Terms of Use, and Guidelines.