Jump to content
rllmuk

grindmouse

Members
  • Content Count

    7,908
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by grindmouse

  1. Undoubtedly. He’s making them a shit ton of money via merchandising and indirectly within the MCU. They aren’t making a great deal directly from the Sony-produced movies but everybody benefits from the current agreement.* *Unless you hate the current Parker-Stark relationship but that plotline is now over anyway. I love the idea of having Osborne and Spider-man front and centre in the next phase of MCU. So Disney need to make this happen. Not least to save us from Spider-man vs Venom.
  2. I consume these superhero films without feeling much for them, but Spider-man is far and away my favourite - he’s more popular than any individual MCU character. Even Iron-man.
  3. It’s weird Disney apparently aren’t budging when they stand to lose far more from this deal going South. Even if they’re not making bank on individual Spider-man movies, his popularity brings them cash from tons of other avenues, including their own MCU movies by association.
  4. 50% of funding doesn’t offset a 50% loss in box office take. That’s like offering to pay $100m to take $500m.
  5. My earlier post was incorrect on the details: The existing deal is 5% of first day take. Which is low but Sony pay for everything. Disney get 5% for their creative input and nothing else. Sony doesn’t have merch rights, they go to Disney, Sony only makes profit off the total box office take. The new deal Disney asked for was 50% of the total box office take. Disney still take all merch profits. So this is a terrible deal for Sony. Reportedly, even so, they went as high as 30% - but Disney wouldn’t budge. Disney/MCU are now waging a social media war against Sony. Sony Pictures are still arrogant and creatively bankrupt, but they do own the movie rights to Spider-man, so Disney is the bad guy here.
  6. Asa Butterworth might have worked out even better than Holland, though. MCU have been consistent with their casting choices.
  7. Sony’s previous 3x live action Spider-man films have been poor (I love S3, but it was a disaster). GB16 was poor. MIB International was poor. Venom was an anomaly that didn’t deserve it’s box office take. MCU involvement will consistently yield results for them. 500m every two years versus 700m once and then likely critical and box office rejection.
  8. So reading this correctly... Disney/Marvel were like “two more movies split 50/50?” and Sony responded with a measly 5% of first take for Fiege/MCU involvement? Update: (This was misinformation see follow-up post) Sony Pictures Creative team and Amy Pascal are fucking dire. Venom is one of the worst films I’ve seen in recent memory, even worse than the bottom of the MCU barrel and I hated some of those. The way Sony handle it’s blockbuster live action franchises is inept to the point of absurdity. The idea they can just take Spider-man back into their own Venom universe and take the same money is incredibly short-sighted. They’ll get a couple of decent returns on the Venom sequel and another Holland Spidey - both will review poorly and suffer a revolt from MCU fans - and then it’ll be kaput and reboot time again. This has to be a negotiation tactic, surely?
  9. Well this is great. But also tedious and meandering in places. I understand why this is the case - to setup the climax and soak in the period atmosphere. My main reservation: I found the criticisms of the Bruce Lee cameo, Tate’s portrayal and the dog food scene to be completely unjustified in the context of the finished film. It’s middling Tarentino. DiCaprio is amazing as always. As such it’s essential viewing, but there’s a better 2-hr film in there.
  10. Thoughts... The CGI is incredible, but I don’t think the wildlife-doc aesthetic adds anything and in many ways detracts. It’s main crime is bloat, which doesn’t serve the wafer thin story too well. This didn’t need to be 2 hours. The voice acting was worse across the board - Zazu and the hyenas were awful. Timon and Pumba were the highlight and the added material and expanded cast of animals during their section was the most engaging part. The lioness’ could’ve wrecked Scar and the hyenas at any time, it was nonsensical they needed Simba to motivate them. And it didn’t make any sense Simba blamed himself for his father’s death in light of all the evidence. Overall I felt this was pointless and overlong, and I wish they’d updated the plot a little to justify the remake. Still, at least it wasn’t Dumbo.
  11. TBF their monetisation is in line with Fortnite now, it was the RNG that was objectionable. But ultimately they're just cosmetics, and their methods are in line with current industry standards. Respawn are taking unecessary flak over this imo.
  12. With full passive shards, best gear, the meal boosts, all of OD’s books, max High Jump and Accelerator, the speed and movement are incredibly satisfying. Whizzing around with projectiles like a shmup boss. I felt unstoppable and then... the kunekune offed me in about 3 seconds. Fear the kunekune.
  13. So far spent.... *checks save file*.... 5 hours preparing food and crafting items. I weirdly enjoyed it. Still gotta... Beat Harrier. All shards and demons. Beat IGA and OD. Beat Bael. I'm really hoping they let you carry the character over to the additional DLC / co-op / PvP content.
  14. @deKay Fair point. Surely the chances these guys make it into Smash just shot up by about 1,000,000%. A Nintendo exclusive sequel to the biggest Japanese retro platformer outside of Mario/Sonic, a cherished arcade game and a port that featured on the NES Classic Mini. A moveset that writes itself. #believe
  15. I doubt anybody watching that video thought it was Space Invaders. They’re going for a NSMB / Pacman CE / Space Invaders Extreme aesthetic. I get you hate the art style, and I share your reservations, but I’ll hold out pre-judging the game itself.
  16. I get what you’re saying but... because they’re IP’s from the same era both owned by Taito? I expect it was intended to be a fun retro reference, like the rainbows.
  17. It’s worth checking out the sequels: Bubble Bobble II: Bubble Symphony (and to a lesser extent, Bubble Memories). Bubble Symphony is the best looking Bubble Bobble game. The easiest way to play it is probably via a PS Classic Mini and a rom backup of your legitimate physical copy. If anyone has any better ways of playing the sequels do share.
  18. It’s obviously a low budget title, but if you slow-mo the gameplay in the trailer looks like it could be solid. I’m curious about the tron-style platforms in some stages - whether they’re a mechanic or just aesthetic. The only major negative is the “kid’s room” aesthetic and enemy designs. There are 3x enemy types shown: Puyo, Flower, Spinner. I hate the Puyo and Flower, they seem lazy and straight out of Bomberman R. The dragons themselves look great. I would much rather they’d brought back the classic enemies but these will just be early stages I guess. Perhaps foolishly, I still have faith Taito will deliver a decent BB sequel.
  19. The art style in the promo art is at least better than the DS versions. But yeah, could be better. The game itself isn’t too bad. Reminds me of Pac-man CE or Bomberman R. I’ll give it the benefit of the doubt, because one of the earlier sequels (Memories?) was a bit rubbish in the gfx dept but the gameplay was still decent iirc.
  20. Taito are releasing a new Bubble Bobble sequel on Switch this November. It’s 4 player. I don’t care if the game turns out jank, gonna take that physical edition. And hopefully Bub & Bob get a Smash Bros DLC slot as well. Would love this to lead to a Bubble Bobble 1-3, Rainbow Islands, Parasol Stars collection on Switch. More here: https://www.videogameschronicle.com/news/4-player-switch-bubble-bobble-to-launch-exclusively-first-in-europe/
  21. Yeah that seems crazy and I’m only just starting out. I’m at 99.50% map, just using Detectives Eye while farming. I don’t understand how I could’ve got this far without 100%ing the demons...
  22. Hugely disappointing. The game really needed it. I wonder if we’ll see it in Minecraft 2 as an exclusive for the next Xbox.
  23. I’ve got Iga, secret boss and the final boss to beat, but I too have fallen down a farming and crafting rabbit hole. Currently clocking 18 hours. I’ve barely scratched the surface with food and habe no idea how you can get through the game without encountering approx 80% of food items. What gives?
  24. Is Sakura decent tier? I need to pick a character to learn and stick to it. Played a few hours of local play over the weekend and ended with 95% losses...
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue. Use of this website is subject to our Privacy Policy, Terms of Use, and Guidelines.