Jump to content


Photo

Robocop Remake - February 2014 - PG13 Rating Confirmed at ComicCon


  • Please log in to reply
2336 replies to this topic

#61 Vemsie

Vemsie
  • Supporters
  • 28721 posts

Posted 26 February 2005 - 09:39 AM

Phill Tippet did ED-209 right? The man's a fucking legend. Also responsible for the AT-AT's, AT-ST's, Taun-Tauns, Wampa and Rancor in the Star Wars OT, some of the dino's in Jurassic Park and the bugs in Starship Troopers. Oh yeah, and the Reapers in Blade II.
  • 0

#62 dismembo

dismembo
  • Members
  • 1495 posts

Posted 26 February 2005 - 09:55 AM

Phill Tippet did ED-209 right? The man's a fucking legend. Also responsible for the AT-AT's, AT-ST's, Taun-Tauns, Wampa and Rancor in the Star Wars OT, some of the dino's in Jurassic Park and the bugs in Starship Troopers. Oh yeah, and the Reapers in Blade II.

And don't forget, one of my personal favourites, the dragon in 'DragonSlayer'. Still the best movie dragon ever, if you ask me.
  • 0

#63 cyd charisse

cyd charisse
  • Members
  • 1152 posts

Posted 26 February 2005 - 11:15 AM

Stop motion ED-209 is absolutely prefect. End of story.

I agree. At first I liked CGI and what it could do, but now I prefer the old methods; they just feel more solid, more mechanical, and when you're talking about ED-209, that can only be a good thing. If nothing else, there's more artistry to appreciate. 90% of CGI leaves me underwehelmed. The Star Wars prequels look like nothing more than the modern equivalent of the old Saturday morning matinees Episode 4 was meant to render obsolete. Puppet Yoda still rules, even though it would have been next to impossible to do his fight in AOTC, which was quite a twattish thing to do, apart from getting a cheap laugh, anyway.

What, are they going to make a CGI ED-209 do? A tap dance? You don't need CGI robots. It would take away the essence of the machine.

As well as ED-209, Peter Weller was also perfect. I'm sure other actors could be perfect too, but all Weller's successors so far have just looked like someone in Robocop fancy dress. They didn't move right, they didn't act right, Weller did.

That's me done. Your move, creep.
  • 0

#64 Vemsie

Vemsie
  • Supporters
  • 28721 posts

Posted 26 February 2005 - 11:19 AM

This thread makes want to watch Robocop. Again.
  • 0

#65 linkster

linkster
  • Members
  • 26400 posts

Posted 26 February 2005 - 11:21 AM

Posted Image

Yeh, robots are meant to be jerky but, ffs, I'm sure I can see an animator's hand in one of the frames! Probably Rolf Harris', although I thought his work was above that.

Bollocks. The jerkiness makes it scary.
  • 0

#66 Dreamcastmaster

Dreamcastmaster
  • Members
  • 8094 posts

Posted 26 February 2005 - 11:32 AM

Another vote for the fact that the stop motion ED209 is one of the greatest movie villians of the 80's.
  • 0

#67 Duncan

Duncan
  • Members
  • 31359 posts

Posted 26 February 2005 - 11:40 AM

no no no - it MOVES menacingly enough, but are you seriously telling me that the way it looks on the screen couldn't be improved? it looks like a completely different resolution to what's happening around it at times.
  • 0

#68 Spunky Monkey

Spunky Monkey
  • Members
  • 7562 posts

Posted 26 February 2005 - 12:07 PM

I think the stop motion could be improved loads with CGI, while the Stop motion is nice enough some of the scenes are far too jerky. I think a bit of CGI for walking scenes and large scale models for other scenes would work wonders.
  • 0

#69 Vemsie

Vemsie
  • Supporters
  • 28721 posts

Posted 26 February 2005 - 12:16 PM

I think everybody should stop mentioning the words Robocop and remake.
  • 0

#70 Pob

Pob
  • Moderators
  • 12595 posts

Posted 26 February 2005 - 12:19 PM

In theory, the stop-motion ED209 should look as unconvincing as a CGI one, as both effects are composited in afterwards, meaning there is nothing for the actors to react to. But it's the staccato, awkward motions that really give ED209 his menacing appeal. CGI is just too smooth, too perfect.

Also, you can bet that if they made it again today, they wouldn't use an in-camera model, instead putting in CGI version into every shot, and having it do 'cute' things like examine it's guns or waggle its toes, drawing attention to itself at every opportunity like the very worst extra.

Yes, it's very obvious when you're watching the stop-motion version of ED209, but it looks fucking great! I expect it to become THE hot military product for the next decade.
  • 0

#71 cyd charisse

cyd charisse
  • Members
  • 1152 posts

Posted 26 February 2005 - 12:49 PM

I think everybody should stop mentioning the words Robocop and remake.

It might be fun to have it updated.

Attacker: 'There's more hair... down there!'

Robocop: 'Are you joking? In this day and age? Not bloody likely.'
  • 0

#72 Vemsie

Vemsie
  • Supporters
  • 28721 posts

Posted 26 February 2005 - 12:51 PM

Robocop: Shave
  • 0

#73 Spunky Monkey

Spunky Monkey
  • Members
  • 7562 posts

Posted 26 February 2005 - 04:29 PM

Ive just rewatched this again...because of you lot :D
  • 0

#74 Duncan

Duncan
  • Members
  • 31359 posts

Posted 26 February 2005 - 04:46 PM

Ive just rewatched this again...because of you lot :D

everyone give themselves a round of applause!
  • 0

#75 SeanR

SeanR
  • Supporters
  • 106323 posts

Posted 26 February 2005 - 05:38 PM

everyone give themselves a round of applause!

"Give the man a hand" :lol:
  • 0

#76 Venice Cull

Venice Cull
  • Members
  • 8552 posts

Posted 26 February 2005 - 06:16 PM

Yes, it's very obvious when you're watching the stop-motion version of ED209, but it looks fucking great! I expect it to become THE hot military product for the next decade.

Perhaps with a full renovation program? Spare parts for 25 years? Who cares if it worked or not!
  • 0

#77 Space Renegade Ulala

Space Renegade Ulala
  • Members
  • 15428 posts

Posted 26 February 2005 - 06:47 PM

The old man thought it was pretty important. Dick.
  • 0

#78 Pob

Pob
  • Moderators
  • 12595 posts

Posted 26 February 2005 - 07:44 PM

Does anyone have that music from when he goes back to visit his old house and finds it deserted? I've got lots of action music, but not that one.
  • 0

#79 linkster

linkster
  • Members
  • 26400 posts

Posted 27 February 2005 - 01:23 AM

no no no - it MOVES menacingly enough, but are you seriously telling me that the way it looks on the screen couldn't be improved? it looks like a completely different resolution to what's happening around it at times.

What kind of question is that? Why wwould you even want to 'improve' on something that was absolutely perfect at the time?
  • 0

#80 Droo

Droo
  • Members
  • 18648 posts

Posted 27 February 2005 - 02:34 AM

It should be a prequel, simply titled:

"Cop"

we could have murphy looking at blenders longingly, as if knowing what his future has in store for him...
  • 0

#81 Vemsie

Vemsie
  • Supporters
  • 28721 posts

Posted 27 February 2005 - 10:47 AM

Just found out the old man died recently.

RIP
  • 0

#82 Fry Crayola

Fry Crayola
  • Members
  • 19368 posts

Posted 27 February 2005 - 01:21 PM

It should be a prequel, simply titled:

"Cop"

we could have murphy looking at blenders longingly, as if knowing what his future has in store for him...

Would these electrical appliances be giving him a double polaroid?
  • 0

#83 SeanR

SeanR
  • Supporters
  • 106323 posts

Posted 27 February 2005 - 03:57 PM

Posted Image

Yes, it is... Pretty simple math, huh Bob?
  • 0

#84 bignige

bignige
  • Members
  • 1157 posts

Posted 28 February 2005 - 12:13 PM

Maybe he should do "I, Robocop"?!
  • 0

#85 XBOKS

XBOKS
  • Moderators
  • 1903 posts

Posted 28 February 2005 - 11:22 PM

Ive just rewatched this again...because of you lot :D

Does it hurt? ... Does it hurt? :P
  • 0

#86 Corleth the Fey

Corleth the Fey
  • Members
  • 6011 posts

Posted 01 March 2005 - 09:38 AM

"What's the time? .......... 6 15.........."

Death and resurrection from a 1st person view, this film is so good.

"Roger 154. Back up is currently unavailable."
  • 0

#87 Pob

Pob
  • Moderators
  • 12595 posts

Posted 01 March 2005 - 11:39 AM

"What's the time? .......... 6 15.........."

Death and resurrection from a 1st person view, this film is so good.

Yeah, I love that bit. I love the raster filter on all the first person shots - gives the film a unique, futuristic look.

Played the arcade game again on MAME the other day - what a classic! Managed to get up to the ball and chain thing in the junkyard on one credit. Was quite pleased with that.

Lose the arm.
  • 0

#88 Alex W.

Alex W.
  • Supporters
  • 51165 posts

Posted 01 March 2005 - 05:23 PM

"What's the time? .......... 6 15.........."

Death and resurrection from a 1st person view, this film is so good.

"Roger 154. Back up is currently unavailable."

One of the most amazing moments in film history.
  • 0

#89 hash ampersand

hash ampersand
  • Members
  • 827 posts

Posted 02 March 2005 - 08:57 AM

Clarence! You got a new toy!

Can I Play?


Remaking Robocop would be wacker than making a textile based puppet version for the CBBC channel. Or further still, remaking the ITV edit and releasing that in the cinema. (Someone must have that version on the net somewhere). A CGI fest just wouldn't stand up.

I'm so glad that everyone else remembers the same bits in robocop, especially Dick Jones' go-go gadget arms, the brilliant little media skits (Nukem!), the soundbites, and the fact that he needs about 30 seconds to 'boot up', a bit like the Terminator.

Paul Verhoeven = genius, and coined the phrase "The robot American Jesus" with respect to robocop. How can you argue with that?
  • 0

#90 Rayn

Rayn
  • Members
  • 13796 posts

Posted 02 March 2005 - 12:17 PM

And here I was thinking I was the only kid on the planet who adored this movie when it came out!
  • 0


2 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 2 guests, 0 anonymous users